From Close Complexity to Confidence at Every Balance
ANP Consulting partners with Trintech to advance financial close automation, reconciliation control and record-to-report excellence.
The financial close is where trust is earned
Finance transformation is often measured by the sophistication of the planning model, the polish of the dashboard or the speed of the forecast. But every one of those outputs depends on a more fundamental question: can the organisation trust its underlying financial data?
When balance sheet reconciliations are maintained in spreadsheets, transactions are matched manually, close activities are tracked across disconnected files and journal entries move through email, the cost extends beyond time. Finance teams face higher audit exposure, limited visibility, inconsistent controls and less capacity for meaningful analysis.
A partnership built around the complete Office of Finance
ANP Consulting is pleased to announce its partnership with Trintech, a global provider of cloud-based financial close and reconciliation software. This collaboration extends ANP’s EPM capabilities into the record-to-report layer, the operational foundation that supports accurate actuals, dependable reporting and more effective planning.
The objective is not simply to digitise existing tasks. It is to help finance organisations redesign close processes around standardisation, automation, accountability and measurable control.
The ANP perspective: planning is only as strong as the actuals and controls supporting it.
What Trintech enables
Trintech’s portfolio addresses key financial close and reconciliation activities, including transaction matching, balance sheet reconciliation, close task management, journal entry workflows and governance. Its platform options allow organisations to align automation with their scale, process maturity and compliance environment.
Trintech’s platform portfolio: fit for different finance realities
A successful financial close automation strategy starts with platform fit. Cadency and Adra address different operating contexts, so the decision should be based on organisational complexity, transaction volume, entity structure, control requirements and the desired transformation roadmap.
Cadency: structured control across complex close environments
- Enterprise-scale operations: supports multi-entity, multi-jurisdiction and high-volume record-to-report requirements.
- Broad process coverage: supports reconciliation, transaction matching, intercompany accounting and journal-related workflows.
- Governance and visibility: helps organisations strengthen auditability, compliance oversight and risk management.
Adra: modular automation for the mid-market
- Matcher: supports multi-way matching across sources such as bank, card and POS data.
- Balancer: supports balance sheet reconciliation with configurable thresholds and audit trails.
- Task Manager: organises close checklists, ownership, status and segregation-of-duties controls.
- Journal Entry: supports standardised voucher creation and ERP connectivity.
- Analytics: enables close-performance reporting through tools such as Power BI, Excel, Tableau and OData-compatible applications.
Product fit, available connectors, implementation duration and commercial scope should be confirmed during a detailed discovery and solution assessment.
Why financial close automation belongs in an EPM strategy
EPM does not begin with a forecast. It begins with reliable actuals.
If reconciliations remain unresolved and the close calendar is unpredictable, planning teams inherit late adjustments, unexplained variances and uncertainty in the baseline used for decision-making.
One connected Office of Finance transformation journey
With Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Drivetrain and Trintech, ANP Consulting can help connect the finance operating cycle from reconciliation and financial close, through consolidation and reporting, into planning, forecasting and performance management.
This broader perspective helps organisations avoid isolated technology decisions. The goal is a connected finance architecture in which close quality, data governance, reporting confidence and planning effectiveness reinforce one another.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Trintech help finance teams automate?
Transaction matching, balance sheet reconciliation, close task management, journal workflows and related governance activities.
How do Cadency and Adra differ?
Cadency is positioned for complex enterprise record-to-report environments, while Adra offers modular close automation for mid-market teams.
Why connect financial close with EPM?
Reliable reconciled actuals create a stronger foundation for forecasting, reporting, variance analysis and performance management.
READY TO MODERNISE YOUR FINANCIAL CLOSE?
Contact ANP Consulting for a close assessment, platform-fit discussion or Trintech demonstration.
